FOR LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT1
Adverse Event reporting information can be found in footer
Request a Meeting
Find out how the two compared in this prospective study to assess efficacy and safety for luteal support
Trial type: prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label (assessor blind) phase III study
Participants: 1,211 ART patients
Main outcome measures: biochemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates
Comparator agents for luteal phase support: Endometrin® (100 mg vaginal progesterone tablets; marketed as Lutigest® in the UK) twice daily (n = 404), 100mg three times daily (n=404) and P(4) 90 mg 8% get daily (n=403)
Protocol: progesterone for luteal phase support was administered the day after oocyte retrieval and continued for up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.
Ongoing pregnancy rate: Pregnancy rates were high and similar in all treatment groups, with biochemical rates ~50%, clinical and ongoing rate ≥40%.
Live birth rate: 35%-38% in all treatment groups
Adverse event profiles: similar across groups
Pregnancy rates and live birth rates for Endometrin (twice daily and three times daily) were high and similar to those for P(4) gel. The adverse event profiles for both endometrin doses were similar to that for P(4) gel and primarily due to IVF stimulation and oocyte retrieval. Endometrin was well tolerated.
Job Code: UK-LUG-2300004 - Date of preparation: September 2023